system of common law造句
例句與造句
- Punitive damages are the special product of damages system of common law system , however there are always dispute related to its conformity and justice
懲罰性損害賠償是英美法系上特有的賠償制度,這一制度的合理性一直是存在爭(zhēng)議的。 - " amicus curiae " briefs was briefly applied in the litigation system of common law countries such as britain and the united states . at present , there are fewer presentations on this issue in china
Wto爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制當(dāng)中并沒有關(guān)于“法庭之友”及其陳述的規(guī)定,但“法庭之友”及其陳述卻在wto爭(zhēng)端解決的實(shí)踐當(dāng)中頻頻出現(xiàn)。 - Most of the civil codes in the countries of the system of civil law had the definite regulations related to it ; furthermore , in the countries of the system of common law , the regulations on it had reached the precise degree
債的更新制度起源于羅馬法,至今,不僅在絕大多數(shù)大陸法系國(guó)家的民法典中有明文規(guī)定,即使在極其注重實(shí)用性的英美法系國(guó)家亦發(fā)展成為一套獨(dú)立完備的制度體系。 - This chapter is divided into two parts , is to introduce for the example to the relating to civil retrial procedure regulation of system of civil law with german and japan . secondly introduce for the example to the system of common law extends relief to the system
本章分為兩部分,一是以德國(guó)、日本為例對(duì)大陸法系國(guó)家的民事再審程序規(guī)定進(jìn)行介紹;二是以美國(guó)的重新審理的規(guī)定為例對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家救濟(jì)制度進(jìn)行介紹。 - On the basis of comparing more foreign scientific evidence mode , fully consider the lawsuit culture of china , it is appearing that the trend of integration of advanced lawsuit culture among the system of civil law 、 the system of common law and system of china law . regarding theory of the due process as guide , taking the rule of admissibility of scientific evidence as the basic point with , author have put forward the scientific evidence
在比較外國(guó)科學(xué)證據(jù)模式的基礎(chǔ)上，充分考量了中國(guó)的訴訟文化，以及正在出現(xiàn)的與兩大法系先進(jìn)訴訟文化融合的趨勢(shì)，以正當(dāng)程序的理念為指導(dǎo)，以科學(xué)證據(jù)可采性規(guī)則為基點(diǎn)，提出了單一專家證人和法院專家顧問的科學(xué)證據(jù)程序功能模式，并對(duì)這一模式的主要規(guī)范進(jìn)行了論證。 - It's difficult to find system of common law in a sentence. 用system of common law造句挺難的
- Second chapter is the judge ’ s right of interpretation and civil action model for judge , and who has introduced the different models the circumstances of the judge ’ s right of interpretation , and the civil lawsystem model has clearly and definitely to stipulate , and the value is laid special emphasis on fai ; and the system of common law has similar judge , that the value is laid special emphasis on in the efficiency
第二部分為法官釋明權(quán)與民事訴訟模式,介紹了不同模式的法官釋明權(quán)的情況,大陸型當(dāng)事人主義模式對(duì)釋明權(quán)有明確規(guī)定,價(jià)值側(cè)重于公平;英美型當(dāng)事人主義模式中有類似法官釋明權(quán)規(guī)定,價(jià)值側(cè)重于效率。 - The thesis takes the background of that chinese listed companies introduces independent director system of common law for the deficiency and flaw of supervisory board presently . it bases upon the existing situation of coexistence of independent directors system and supervisory board system , analyses the actual effect of supervise of independent directors from various angles , then draws a conclusion : in fact , independent director system cannot play the function that we hope
本文以我國(guó)上市公司引入英美法獨(dú)立董事制度以彌補(bǔ)監(jiān)事會(huì)監(jiān)督力量之不足為背景，立足我國(guó)上市公司獨(dú)立董事與監(jiān)事會(huì)制度并存的現(xiàn)狀，從多角度就獨(dú)立董事在我國(guó)上市公司中監(jiān)督實(shí)效進(jìn)行剖析，從中得出這樣一個(gè)結(jié)論，即我國(guó)目前的獨(dú)立董事制度實(shí)際上無法達(dá)到所謂的強(qiáng)化董事會(huì)獨(dú)立性、完善上市公司內(nèi)部監(jiān)督的目的。 - First of all , by comparing the differences and commons of the definition of the witness in system of civil law , system of common law and in our country , it concludes that the definition of the witness is similar to that in the system of civil law . as far as the competence of the witness is concerned , the article firstly compares and analyzes the provisions in two families of law , then analyzes the stipulations about the competence of the witness in our country , and come to the conclusion that the stipulation that unit has the competence of the witness is not scientific and the stipulation that persons of legal incapacity and persons of limited indisposing capacity can not be really carried out in judicial practice
在證人概念方面,通過比較分析英美法系國(guó)家、大陸法系國(guó)家和我國(guó)對(duì)證人概念的定義表述和界定范圍的異同,得出我國(guó)對(duì)證人概念的理解與大陸法系國(guó)家相似的結(jié)論;在證人資格方面,首先對(duì)兩大法系國(guó)家的證人資格規(guī)定進(jìn)行了比較和研究,然后又對(duì)我國(guó)有關(guān)證人資格的規(guī)定進(jìn)行了分析,并提出自己的觀點(diǎn),即單位具有證人資格的規(guī)定不科學(xué),無行為能力人、限制行為能力人作為證人的規(guī)定在實(shí)踐中可能不會(huì)得到真正貫徹。